.

SANDAG Discourages Lawsuits in Update on City Sand Project, Ponding

Homeowner association leader and SANDAG rep dispute whether lawsuit was suggested.

At a City Council meeting Wednesday, Seacoast Drive residents and beachgoers continued to call for more action by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to address property damage and ponding.

Residents call the damage a result of the 450,000 cubic yards of sand supplied by SANDAG’s Regional Beach Sand Project.

 “They still don’t understand the problem,” Boca Rio Condos resident Bob Hansen said of SANDAG. “They don’t address any of the problems. They just paint a beautiful picture of how wonderful they did.”

Following the completion of the project last October, residents complained about ocean water flooding garages, carports and other areas of their homes.

Seacoast residents are concerned about the long-term damage the project may cause their homes. Surfrider Foundation representatives also spoke on the sand project’s effect on surfing and safety.

In recent weeks, though an agreement with the City of Imperial Beach, bulldozers have been sent to the beach to make openings in the new sand to allow water that gathers during high tide events to flow back to the ocean, but residents insist that is not the answer.

At Wednesday’s meeting, Hansen and about 20 other residents, including Councilman Ed Spriggs, who lives on Seacoast, clamored for SANDAG to hire a hydrologist to see what is beneath the sand.

Hansen said hiring a hydrologist would be a step in the right direction in solving the problem.

“We need to know what’s underneath the surface, and SANDAG just doesn’t want to admit they’ve done a lousy job,” he told a council chamber with 50 people.

Shelby Tucker, SANDAG’s project manager, said she has witnessed residents’ property damage and several ponding issues firsthand, but maintains that the project is not all to blame for ponding issues.

“The ponding is occurring as a result of overtopping of waves, and we believe there is a connection between placing more sand on the beach and the ponding that occurred,” she said.

Tucker said to stop ponding they have to cut east and west openings to allow the water to drain back out. Additional regrading also is required to sort out areas where lower-lying sand would collapse, she said.  

Robin Clegg, president of the Boca Rio Condos homeowners association, said SANDAG told her if she did not like what they were doing in fixing the problem—or if there was property damage—she should file a lawsuit against SANDAG. 

Hansen said SANDAG told him the same thing.

Tucker denied such a statement was made.

“That is not true,” she said. “We would never want to encourage litigation. It would never be our goal to get to litigation. We would never want to have circumstances be such that people are harmed in a way that they feel litigation is required.”

Tucker said it was unfortunate that  “a lot of threats” of legal action have been made.

“I think everybody wants this to be resolved and to have the beach be a wide sandy area for people to recreate and enjoy,” she said.

Hansen said Seacoast residents do not want to file a lawsuit. They just want the problem fixed, he said.

Councilwoman Lorie Bragg praised SANDAG’s efforts in trying to find a solution, but said the project clearly had some “deficiencies and severe consequences.”

Bragg said she wants to see immediate results from SANDAG and said it should satisfy residents’ request for a hydrologist.

“I think [Bragg] really nailed the SANDAG people. ‘We want results now.’ She asked the probing questions,” Hansen said.

Libi Uremovic February 22, 2013 at 12:55 AM
'...Robin Clegg, ... said SANDAG told her ..she should file a lawsuit ...Hansen said SANDAG told him the same thing....' that's the mentality of the pillagers of the taxpayer dollars because they've already pocketed so much in the past they feel nothing can stop them... knowing the taxpayer has to use their own money while they used taxpayer dollars to pay for their legal battles gives them a lot of arrogance... for whatever use sandag may have had in the past ...it's become nothing more than a bureaucracy full of politicians that are willing to sell out the public to whoever pads their pockets......
Robin Clegg February 22, 2013 at 01:33 AM
Liar liar pants on fire Shelby!!
Ed Sorrels February 22, 2013 at 03:03 AM
JUST A THOUGHT !I have sat thru both last month's and this month's discussions about south seacoast, and I have a couple of observations. In 10 13 years when our beach is gone again who do we contact to bring in more sand ?. Were there hydrological studies done before those homes were built? If not why not ? Look at the reserve and you see where ground water llevel is, There now two completely different types of sand on the beach the old original fine grain sand where water migration is slow impeaded by grain size and this new corse grain which doesn't impede as much, on top of it the ponding creates a false ground level and the water it's self increases the pressure on the existing ground water level and it is percoluating up trying to achieve equalibrium with the trapped water in the new sands which is creating the problem, But the first question is who authorized the building of those structures on south seacoast to start with ? Who signed off on the Hydrology and piering underneath ! ?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something