Politics & Government

City Discusses Privacy Concerns Around Beach Camera System

The cameras to be paid for by the Department of Homeland Security are intended to improve safety and border security but have also raised privacy concerns.

A Department of Homeland Security funded camera system is intended to enhance safety and security along the Imperial Beach shoreline and U.S.-Mexico border also raised privacy concerns for at least one member of the Imperial Beach City Council at a meeting Wednesday.

"This could have potentially privacy invading views of households," Councilman Ed Spriggs.

The zoom and infrared cameras cameras will be placed at the main lifeguard tower on Evergreen Avenue, on the pier and on lamp posts at the south end of Seacoast Drive and at the end of Palm Avenue near The Spirit of Imperial Beach.

Find out what's happening in Imperial Beachwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The cameras will be able to see a distance of three miles, will operate 24 hours a day and record up to 30 days of footage.

Cameras placed on the Imperial Beach Pier and end of Seacoast Drive in particular may have the ability to look into people's backyards and homes, Spriggs said.

Find out what's happening in Imperial Beachwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Despite concerns, city council voted unanimously to approve a resolution Wednesday to accept a $125,000 federal grant to purchase, install and maintain a surveillance system for the next three years.

"My expectation is there will not be abuse," said Public Safety Department Director Tom Clark. Video monitoring software can be used to "stop the range of motion before it even gets close to the house."

Clark said the city will look to purchase a camera system and monitoring software that will limit the cameras' ability to see into homes or backyards.

"If they can't do that then we're going to restrict it to just the water area and not do it at all to the east so that it won't look at backyards, so that it's only going to look and point right down at the end of the Boca Rios and not into the homes there," Clark said.

The issue was originally part of the agenda consent calendar, meaning it would be approved with no discussion. 

Spriggs said overall he supports the camera system but requested the issue be removed from the consent calendar so a discussion could take place and to force city council "to take responsibility for addressing all those considerations and concerns rather than leaving it on consent and have people speculate that we're trying to pass something through without any public scrutiny."

Spriggs lives on Seacoast Drive and is a member of the Seacoasters, a group of local residents and business owners who seek improvements for the beachfront street.

Beyond software to limit the cameras' movement, checks will be in place to prevent misuse, Clark said. 

City supervisors will be able to monitor footage and camera movement live and camera footage will be recorded to allow supervisors to periodically monitor or go back to review, he said. 

Lifeguards will use the cameras during regular business hours. The U.S. Border Patrol, San Diego County Sheriff's Department and California Department of Fish and Game will be allowed access to the surveillance system in the lifeguard tower after hours.

Stabenow, Clark and the sheriff's department will be able to access video from the cameras without the need to be in the main lifeguard tower. Others with access to the camera system, including U.S. Border Patrol, will have to physically enter the lifeguard station to use the cameras.

The federal government may be able to gain remote access in the future, Stabenow said. All cameras placed on the border by the federal government, like ones on a pole in Border Field State Park, are monitored via remote access, said Ralph Desio with U.S. Border Patrol.

In addition to monitoring the area for illegal activity near the border, the cameras will make the Imperial Beach shoreline a safer place to be, Clark said, particularly when fog, glare of the sun or nightfall restrict what can be seen with a pair of binoculars.

"I've worked up in that pier tower hundreds of hours and it's like the air traffic controller of an airport," said Councilman Bobby Patton, who was an Imperial Beach lifeguard for more than two decades before joining city council last year. "You're directing people to make rescues but there's a lot of blind spots on our beach."

Beachgoers and people who illegally enter U.S. waters from Mexico alike will be easier to see to take into custody or rescue.

"These are going to be tools that not only save someone's lives, regardless of where they're coming from, but also are part of our enforcement and border security," Clark said.

A camera at the end of Palm Avenue to monitor beach activity has been out of use for a year due to an outdated software system, Clark said. 

The process to find a particular camera system which will be paid for entirely by the federal government must begin by April 2014, Clark said. Once a system is identified, cameras can be installed and in use within a few months.

What do you think? Are improvements to safety and border security the cameras may provide overwhelming positive news for Imperial Beach or are you concerned the cameras may invade people's privacy?  Share in comments.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here