.

Civilized Countries ban Pits Rots, Shepherds and Dobermans

The Irish and English demanded that Pitbulls, Rotweillers Dobermanns and shepherds be banned from their COUNTRIES. Jews still harbor memories of being chased bitten and killed by German Shepherds in the last war.  Rotweillers and Dobermans are just as bad and Pitbulls are the worst because their instincts are to pursue until they kill after they lock their jaws onto someone.  In England all such terriers with large jaws are banned; the Staffordshire Terrier, the small English Terrier and all Bull terriers and bulldogs.  The English and Irish must ban these dogs because they seek to protect their people and they forbid their people to have guns.  Here a failure to protect citizens from these dogs will result in having everyone arm themselves with concealed weapons to go to the beach and enjoy walking in public.  Cities and Counties in California have banned these dogs; they have no place in Beach Communities.  There is no reason for people who don't live in IB to come here and release their dangerous dogs on us with City approval.  Please help sign the petition to ban these dogs from Imperial Beach so children, people and animals may walk safely to the Beach or on our public sidewalks and streets.
Pat P January 01, 2014 at 03:12 PM
I am sorry your dog was attacked, however I fault that dog's owner. It makes no sense to target entire breeds to be banned due to your own fears. There are dangerous dog laws already. If you have a problem with a dog, call Animal Control. If it's after 5 or on a weekend, call the Sheriff's Office for dangerous dog complaints. You are way overreacting.
Paula Winchester January 04, 2014 at 09:21 AM
Seriously? My ex is Jewish and his last dog was a Doberman and his current dog is a German Shepherd, both dogs are the sweetest most even tempered animals. I've been bitten before by a chihuahua and a cocker spaniel, so should we ban them too? I've known some pit bulls that were just big pussy cats, do not fault the dog because of its owner. I agree with Pat P, you're overreacting.
Libi Uremovic January 04, 2014 at 10:30 AM
'...The Irish and English demanded that Pitbulls, Rotweillers Dobermanns and shepherds be banned from their COUNTRIES...' no they didn't - they just implemented restrictions.....you do realize that the dog breeds are called 'irish shepards' and 'english pits' .... civilized counties don't ban plants and animals because civilized people don't train animals to attack.... maybe it's time to reassess our theory that the states is a 'civilized country'...
caesarina keri January 04, 2014 at 12:08 PM
No Libi, my daughter lived in England.....all Pits and Rots are banned, along with the Staffordshire Terrier (the one with the huge jaws) and other Pitbull Breeds. What "Restrictions" would you be talking about anyway? That they can only pee on certain trees? That they be leashed with chains? As usual you don't know what you're talking about.
caesarina keri January 04, 2014 at 12:12 PM
One MORE TIME people: Listen-UP...I'm not seeking to Ban ANY DOG BREEDS.....I am merely requiring that everyone have insurance to cover damages ..Liability Insurance...common renter or Homeowner Insurance that covers dogs...in case their animal...their so-called "sweet, gentle angel of an animal" bites or injures...or in the case of Pits and Rots...KILLS a child or another animal or person. That's all.....Everybody has to carry Insurance. If you have a chihuahua I wouldn't worry about it...some people may have to pay a little more for Insurance...but that's the breaks...you want to Play you have to pay. You want to show off your Pit Rot or Doby or huge St Bernard or whatever...you pay for it. Got it everybody? No Dog Bans.
Libi Uremovic January 04, 2014 at 12:42 PM
'... As usual you don't know what you're talking about. ...' # 1: fk you - all you have to do is google the laws in other counties to see that the blogs are full of hysteria mongers like yourself making up lies about the laws in other countries to further your agenda in this country ... # 2: i agree that people with pets should have insurance, but regardless of the breed ... the cost of insurance will be levied based partly on the product and partly on the owner ... # 3: the insurance requirements should apply to weapons which are much more harmful to self and society than animals... In 2012, 38 dog attacks resulted in death: 19 child victims and 19 adult victims. 32,885 people died in traffic crashes in 2010 in the United States (latest figures available) annual deaths resulting from firearms in usa total 2011: 32,1631 training attack animals are the result of a deviant society, not the cause of the deviance in society .....
Libi Uremovic January 04, 2014 at 12:45 PM
if dogs are the cause of all the problems in ib then go stand in front of the empty hole at 9th and palm and tell people about it...
Libi Uremovic January 16, 2014 at 10:03 PM
your petition made the reader - http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2014/jan/16/stringers-pit-bull-attack-imperial-beach-b/?utm_content=bufferecb2f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Sim Lincoln January 19, 2014 at 08:20 AM
Said the bit** wanting to carry a CCW. Lady this is the USA not a communist country.
caesarina keri January 19, 2014 at 03:05 PM
Yeah Mr Sim......this is the USA you know...where people band together to get laws passed. We WILL make Pitbulls and their stupid owners in Imperial Beach a thing of the past. And the City WILL conform, if for no other reason than for their dreams of prosperity from the financial windfall of the new Hotel. There are already in the works laws to do so. Why your interest in this thing? Do you have a "dog in the fight" literally and figuratively? Or do you just like to insult people who are trying to exercise their USA right of free speech. I can think of some names for you too but I don't get in the mud with pigs.
SayaR January 20, 2014 at 07:35 AM
Here she says, more or less, "you people are all idiots. I'm not trying to "ban" any breed." Yet the title of this post alone is about civilized countries "banning" certain breeds, and the local news stories she's managed to get floating around say she, "presented a petition to the City Counsel demanding it "ban" pit bulls along the shoreline." So, work on either figuring out exactly what you're after before starting a shitstorm or at least keeping it straight.
caesarina keri January 20, 2014 at 01:53 PM
Saya, Do you have Insurance for your Pitbulls? Responsible owners of dangerous dog breeds are smart enough and decent enough to have insurance...to pay for the injuries.and possible death you inflict on people..... kind of like cleaning up after your dogs. Can you understand this....and surely you agree with it. Or have you found that no one will insure you because you have a Dangerous Dogs. You are man right? Even dogs don't attack female dogs the way you attacked me ...just curious.
SayaR January 20, 2014 at 02:22 PM
I'm not a man- clearly you're default is the "victim" card. Curious, since all dogs can potentially injure people, why not push for all owners to hold liability insurance? Why single one (or in your case several) breeds out?
caesarina keri January 20, 2014 at 04:59 PM
Sayar...I don't have a victim card....I just perceive that male dogs are kinder to female dogs, usually show respect for them and submission to them more than some men show women. I just wanted to know who I'm dealing with here. You're right on the Liability Insurance.....I never did intend to single out some breeds....the only fair way is to require it for owners of all dogs. And I think that the fair way to do it is to take me out of it and just let the Insurance Companies decide, as my friend Mark advised. They are the ones who will have pay after all,, so why not just let them decide how much to charge. I imagine a small dog will be next to nothing and surely covered by ordinary homeowner or renter insurance. As for the Pits, Rots and Dobbies; they are on the List of the Top Ten most Dangerous Breeds and Insurance Companies have already decided on $1,000,000 for fatal injuries...this is the amount used for these dogs in Hawaii, Oregon and Montana. I have not searched out other states....how may states do we need to tell us that these dogs are dangerous. They're dangerous when they're born because the killing traits are in their blood, and that's why most owners who get them as pups dump them in shelters when they're about 6 months old when their killing traits start to show. I just talked to a woman in the Bank last week while I was standing in line (you know that's a drag) and she told me about the pitbull she got as a puppy...and that she was so shocked that one day when it was about a year old it attacked her husband. And they took it to a shelter. Well Surprise Surprise. I'm hope I can help people understand this.....but for those who can't or won't , at least we'll have the Insurance we need to cover the damages from the attacks of their dogs. You know you never really get compensated for an attack...for the pain...and the depression......and the fear of going out again where dogs are. So anyway, happy to clarify for you......so you want to sign the petition now?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something