City of Imperial Beach
November 27, 2012
RE: Request of Public Records 4th REQUEST ATTORNEY FEE CHECK INVOICES
Dear Sir:
I am requesting the following information for the list of attached checks from the City of Imperial Beach:
-
All Purchase Orders and Documentation enlisting the services of the City Attorney Jennifer Lyon and the Law Firm of McDougal, Love, Eckis, Boehmer, & Foley.
-
Invoices and Billing information for the City Attorney Jennifer Lyon and the Law Firm of McDougal, Love, Eckis, Boehmer, & Foley.
Page 42 of The City of Imperial Beach Budget lists the Cost of Total Services for the City Attorney at $205,000. Attached are a listing of the checks issued to McDougal, Love, Eckis, Boehmer, & Foley for the services of Ms. Lyon totaling $416,548.89 for the fiscal year 2011-2012. These checks are coded to 21 different accounting codes; seven are legitimate, seven are dump accounts, and seven are accounts that are not on the budget. The City if Imperial Beach was charged $211,548.89 more than contracted, but the People have no evidence of work done by Ms. Lyon.
The City Attorney is a contract position. California Government Code Section 41804 states: The City Attorney shall receive such compensation as is allowed by the legislative body. There must be both documentation showing the request for services and invoices showing services rendered.
For the past two years the City of Imperial Beach has held Closed Session City Council Meetings with 5 – 9 items on the agenda without any description. At every Council Meeting City Attorney Jennifer Lyons has stated regarding these closed door sessions: “Nothing to report.”
The City of Imperial Beach refuses to disclose any information regarding checks issued to the City Attorney. I have made three (3) record requests for invoices to show why this money was paid. Each time the City has cited Government Code Section 6254(k), Evidence Code Section 952, & Code of Civil Procedure 2018.010 in their reasoning to refuse to release the invoices showing any use of tax payer money.
There is no State law that allows elected and appointed officials to hide expenditures from the People.
California Bar Association Rule 4-200 Fees for Legal Services states that a member shall not enter into an agreement for, charge, or collect an illegal or unconscionable fee. Ms. Lyon has violated the following:
(1) The amount of the fee in proportion to the value of the services performed: The People have no information as to why they were over-charged $211,548.89. Repeated requests for copies of invoices have been ignored by Jennifer Lyon and the Law Firm of McDougal, Love, Eckis, Boehmer, and Foley.
(5) The amount involved and the results obtained: The City is paying over twice as much as agreed, but the only results seen are the City's inability to pay for the basic needs of the community.
(10) The time and labor required: The City and Ms. Lyon has refused to provide any invoices showing time and labor utilized by Ms. Lyon or the Law Office she represents. Ms. Lyon is also Attorney for the City of Calexico and does training and presentations so it is unlikely that she has devoted the amount of time and labor required to justify her fees.
(11) The informed consent of the client to the fee: The City of Imperial Beach was not informed nor did the People consent to these additional fees. For the fiscal year 2010-2011 Financial Statements show the City of Imperial Beach claimed $242,444 in City Attorney fees, but $407,311.01 in checks was issued. This was a material misstatement of $ 164,867.01. These services were coded in nine (9) different accounts. Last year the fees were hidden in 21 different accounting codes, which demonstrates escalating abuse.
Your prompt action on this request is appreciated.
Thank you,
Elizabeth A. Uremovic
642 Ocean Lane # 3
Imperial Beach, CA 91932
(619) 565-2838
libi@libionline.net
the sports park cost the city $186,000....kane ballmer $274,253.85.....mcdougal love was paid $211,548.98 over budget...
Unfortunately, when the "bell ringer" is not taken seriously by either side it is hard to get anyone to listen ...
and the city manager chimes in: 'yea, i should be fired ha ha ha'... and the city attorney chimes in: 'yea, we should fired ha ha ha'... ....then the city clerk standing behind them says: 'you have to flip this switch to turn off the microphone and camera'... apparently our elected and appointed officials thought they just hit the gavel and the episode ends like on t.v.... jaqui hald is the only one of them with an i.q. over 130... i don't need to be taken seriously by either side jon.... i understand that i'm blowing people out of the water...but i move at a different pace...i don't play the game, i solve the problem....i know that giving direction to council is a big scary step for people, but that is the option for the people ... i don't need the people jon...i never counted on the people....it would be good for the people sociologically to stand together as a community....but that aspect is only a study of human nature for me... the audit provides local, state, and federal prosecution the evidence they need to remove them from office and send them to prison.... ask anyone in prison when they realized they were caught and they will always reply: 'when it was too late'...
I think first we need a clear accounting. Libi maybe on to something. Maybe what we need to do as taxpayers is pool our money and hire a special auditor. If the city is clean, they would welcome this. If dirty, they would fight this. I would expect to find a few MINOR accounting errors that should be about it. Any retired CPA’s out there who will work for cheap?
From what I have seen so far there are many "Best Management Practices" that are not in place. My first request would be to see a standard operating procedure on how the invoices are paid. I think this is lacking. It would be a good first step for the city to implement to show some transparency in government. Plus it would make future audits, by special auditors or citizens, more understandable and easier.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes%E2%80%93Oxley_Act I would vote yes on that.
you have lots of distracting ideas...but you never want to hold the people on the payroll responsible for their actions...why is that..?
it's not the line workers - it's the ones on top that are pillaging taxpayer dollars... simply closing the books each month and requiring government officials to stay on their budget is all that needs to be done...
call your council....council has to approve all expenses... every member of council should be able to explain the charges...
I am fully in favor of holding the people on the payroll responsible for their actions. I like long term state prison if they are found guilty. Until then, I will keep an open mind. I have no tolerance for people ripping off the taxpayers. Any questions?
"...Any questions?..." only one question - what's your real name? let's all guess the real identity of the imaginary character: he's stated how ugly i look when i speak to council - so that narrows the list down to eight (8)... we can eliminate jaqui hald as being too intelligent to write 'poop s' over and over...so that leaves seven (7) possibilities... he's from the east coast - dc area ...and he agrees with everything the city does... and he went on the petition website to mayor janney's petition and wrote: 'libiISANIDIOT' ...but he didn't write it on anyone else's petition... can you guess the mystery guest..???